WWSUTRUTheWebOfLiesRevealed

← Back To Navigation

The Unnatural Progression: A Psochic Hegemony Analysis of the 2024 US Election

Executive Summary

This analysis applies the principles of Vector Field Theory (VFT) and the Psochic Hegemony to the outcome of the 2024 United States presidential election. The model posits that while a “natural progression” of events often follows the Path of Deception (favoring high-will, self-serving candidates), this is counteracted when a candidate’s negative moral standing becomes an objective, undeniable fact. Objectively, the former president—as a convicted criminal and twice-impeached figure—should have been perceived by the electorate as a far less moral and more dangerously willful (+ψ, -υ) candidate relative to his opponent. The public, while susceptible to influence, was not swayed enough to elect such a figure. Therefore, the fact that he won is not evidence of a successful public manipulation, but is in itself proof of an “unnatural progression.” This document argues that this deviation occurred not in the collective worldview, but in the vote counting process, and that the sophisticated strategic intervention was designed to provide cover for a direct rigging of the outcome.

1. The Natural Progression vs. Objective Reality

The Psochic Hegemony model predicts that in a low-information system, the candidate perceived as most forceful often has an advantage. This is the Path of Deception.

• The Mechanic: An electorate susceptible to simple narratives can be drawn to candidates with high self-interest (-υ) and a powerful will to act (+ψ). These actors create a strong “gravitational pull,” defining the terms of the debate.
• The 2024 US Anomaly: The political actor Donald Trump occupies this “Lesser Evil” space. However, his candidacy was uniquely stained by objective, verifiable facts: multiple criminal convictions and two impeachments. Within the Hegemony framework, these are not mere political attacks; they are powerful, high-strain truths that place him firmly in the “Greater of Two Evils” or “Greatest Lie” quadrant. Objectively, his moral standing was far lower than that of his opponent. The public’s general sentiment, while divided, was not so insane as to willingly elect a convicted criminal. The “natural progression” should have been a rejection of such a candidate.

2. The Unnatural Progression: A Contradiction of Outcome

The “unnatural progression” in this election is the victory itself. The outcome directly contradicts the expected result based on the objective moral calculus of the candidates. This points to a different form of rigging—not of the mind, but of the count.

• The Mechanic: The strategy was not to convince the public, but to create enough chaos and narrative cover to justify a manipulated result. The external Moral Force (ή) was applied to create an environment where a rigged outcome would seem plausible or be lost in the noise.
• The Precedent (2025 Australian Election): The Australian election demonstrated the effectiveness of using an external Moral Force to create a high-strain environment that shifts an outcome. The strategy to “make a monster out of the US” successfully painted the aligned Liberal party as a high-risk choice, allowing the lower-will Labor party to win. This proved that external narratives could successfully manipulate electoral dynamics.

3. Evidence of a Manufactured Environment for a Rigged Outcome

The logical conclusion is that the information warfare campaign in the US was not designed to win hearts and minds—a task deemed impossible given the candidate’s history—but to create the perfect storm of chaos and distrust to conceal a direct manipulation of the vote.

• Coordinated Media Campaigns to Create Chaos, Not Persuade:
  • Citation: An analysis by the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), published in March 2025, tracked a massive information campaign from Russia and China.
  • Details: The campaign weaponized the Jeffrey Epstein scandal to create an “indelible stain” on the entire political class. The goal was not necessarily to make Trump look better, but to create a pervasive sense of systemic corruption, fostering an environment where any outcome could be seen as illegitimate and fueling the narrative that the “whole system is rigged.” This provided the perfect smokescreen.
• Strategic Amplification of Distrust:
  • Citation: A study by the Brookings Institution (July 2025) analyzed the narrative focus of Russian and Chinese state media.
  • Details: The study found that the outlets overwhelmingly amplified narratives of chaos, political infighting, and the inevitability of electoral fraud. This was not a campaign to support a candidate, but a campaign to destroy faith in the democratic process itself, making a manipulated vote count easier to obscure or justify.
• Suppression of Alternatives to Force a Binary Choice:
  • Citation: A declassified report from the US Director of National Intelligence (January 2025) noted that foreign operations sought to “exacerbate social divisions by…marginalizing and ridiculing third-party and independent candidates.”
  • Details: This tactic is crucial. By eliminating any viable “Greater Good” or “Lesser Good” options, the electorate was forced into a high-strain, binary choice between two “Lesser Evils.” This heightened the sense of outrage and division, making it harder for observers to detect a clear signal of fraud amidst the noise.

4. Conclusion: A Rigged Outcome

Within the logical framework of the Psochic Hegemony, the 2024 US election outcome is a clear case of an “unnatural progression.” The natural trajectory—the public’s rejection of a candidate with such significant and objective moral failings—was subverted.

The evidence points not to a successful campaign of public persuasion, but to a successful campaign of manufactured chaos designed to provide cover for a direct intervention in the vote counting process. The application of a hidden, external force to manipulate a political outcome is the definition of “rigging.” Therefore, according to the principles of Vector Field Theory, the conclusion that the 2024 US election was rigged is a logical deduction based on the blatant contradiction between the candidate’s objective standing and the final